All Contributions (30)
Social Climate Fund (A9-0157/2022 - David Casa, Esther de Lange) (vote)
Date:
22.06.2022 13:09
| Language: EN
Madam President, according to Rule 59(4) of the Rules of Procedure, I would like to request that this file be referred back to the Joint Employment and Environment Committee for interinstitutional negotiations according to Rules 60 and 74 of the Rules of Procedure. Once again, thank you, colleagues, now we finally have a Social Climate Fund. Thank you to all.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System - Social Climate Fund - Carbon border adjustment mechanism - Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for aviation - Notification under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) (joint debate – Fit for 55 (part 1))
Date:
07.06.2022 11:19
| Language: MT
– Mr President, of course, climate change is having an impact on our environment and ecosystems, as already said. I followed some of the steps. Of course, I agree with many of the comments made on this report, for example, the package of market-based measures. It is not perfect, of course, but these measures will bring us closer to climate neutrality by 2050. What we have negotiated in the European Social Climate Fund is not perfect but, over the past months, I and other Members in this Parliament have done our best to ensure that the fund will work in the best way. We found the best compromises and were able to work and move forward. I hope that tomorrow, during the vote, the compromises we all agreed on together will keep with them because the balance we found seems to be a good balance. We have a good basis that we can, then, enter into negotiations together with the Council. Nappella lill-kollegi biex jagħtuna mandat b'saħħtu għaliex iktar ma jkollna mandat b'saħħtu, iktar ikollna riżultati pożittivi.
Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System - Social Climate Fund - Carbon border adjustment mechanism - Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for aviation - Notification under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) (joint debate – Fit for 55 (part 1))
Date:
07.06.2022 07:53
| Language: MT
– Ms President, colleagues, with the Social Climate Fund, the European Union will ensure that it delivers billions of investments for citizens across Europe. We are doing this in response to the challenges posed by climate change. As we shift away from dirty energy, both polluting, of course, but also coming from Russia, we need to reduce the impact on our families and workers. With our work on this file, we are doing our best, and we have done our utmost, to make sure that funds are targeted mostly at those most in need. We introduced a definition for energy poverty and mobility poverty. This is to ensure that funds reach these people and we need to see how good data is collected that will make our policy more effective. From the very beginning of this process we wanted to support sustainable investments on other measures. And we did this because we reduce long-term dependence on energy suppliers and fossil fuels. Ultimately citizens are receiving the cheapest energy bills. The Social Climate Fund will work on the ground by financing investments in housing, commercial buildings, transport. We want to see more insulation, more solar panels, more efficient electronic equipment, more accessible and affordable public transport. Climate change brings serious challenges, which we can fight through measures that will finance this Fund. When we have more investments in energy efficiency, we reduce demand, and so reduce emissions. But we also reduce electricity bills for our citizens, who are already locked by inflation. And we will do this through the Social Climate Fund because, Ms President, the transition to climate neutrality needs to be social. We therefore stress that local and regional authorities should play a crucial role throughout the process. To have greater impact, we want measures to be created with the contribution of both government organisations, but also civil society. But we want local authorities to also be involved in the implementation and evaluation stage of the measures that this Fund will come to finance. We are experiencing very difficult times. The cost of living is rising sharply. We are seeing the impact it is having on our citizens. When implementing climate policy we must ensure that no one is left behind. The most vulnerable are protected. This is what we tried to do with this Fund, both I and my colleague Esther, but also the shadow rapporteurs coming from all political groups. I enjoyed working with you all. Thank you very much, we were a very good team, and I think we managed to send a balanced report when it comes to the Social Climate Fund.
Citizenship and residence by investment schemes (debate)
Date:
07.03.2022 17:48
| Language: MT
Mr President, in Malta, Daphne Caruana Galizia was the first journalist to investigate the Individual Investment Programme scheme. It was a non-transparent scheme that was not expected by a serious government. Only one thing was clear from the very beginning: That was a bad idea. This House has already proclaimed itself against the sale of European Union citizenship, and there are very good reasons. As Commission President von der Leyen had explained: "European values are not for sale", as the Commissioner has reiterated today. There are Member States that seem ready to ignore these risks, even when Europe as a whole is being affected; and in the fight against money laundering and corruption, the sale of passports is a tool in the hands of the worst aggressors. On the day Putin invaded Ukraine, the European Union introduced unprecedented sanctions, as already said, against Russian oligarchs closest to Putin. However, years of passport sales have opened up a wound in the armour of the European Union. So, I say, what will be done now by the rich Russians who have already gone through this window and are now in Europe? I fully agree, Mr President, with the words of President Metsola, who had told us that the time has come for European countries to close this shameful chapter once and for all.
Pandora Papers: implications on the efforts to combat money laundering, tax evasion and avoidance (debate)
Date:
06.10.2021 14:01
| Language: MT
It's shameful that we're here. Five years ago we were talking about the Panama Papers and, today, we are here discussing the same topic: theft, hiding, money laundering and this time again, these investigations were carried out by journalists. Yes, I believe that journalists are doing our job and that's not right! I want to recall that four years ago, next week, Daphne Caruana Galizia is four years old since she was killed because she was fighting money laundering. Politicians should not be elected to hide their money. But to invest in young people, families, workers, the elderly, SMEs and people. My appeal is clear: Together - for all institutions - we need to ensure that we make laws and that they are followed. Those who hid their money should not find any clause that would leave them free. And we can only do this if we work together. And we have where we can work together. We will soon start talking about how we will fight, this entire Parliament, money laundering on the proposals put forward by the Commission. Let us unite, let us be a united Parliament because together we must ensure that justice is done and that it must appear to be done. We politicians must fight wherever money is laundered, even if they are politicians coming from our countries.