Debate contributions by Marko VEŠLIGAJ

Today, the Honourable Chair, the Honourable Colleagues, Commissioner, we are discussing changes to the Common Agricultural Policy framework to make the European agriculture system simpler, fairer, more resilient to the crises that affect our people in the countryside the most. Our farmers, especially small family farms, young people and those in mountain areas ask us for solidarity against the burden that stifles their work. The proposed changes in this compromise relieve them, especially farms up to ten hectares, while clearly promoting the contribution and importance of organic production. In this audit, we preserve the highest environmental standards, while at the same time prioritising people over profit, strengthening the risk management system and disaster funds, as our farmers are often the biggest victims of climate and market shocks. This compromise guarantees transparency, minimum administrative requirements and fairness for villages and clearly ensures that the common agricultural policy is strong, efficient and focused on those for which it was created – for our farmers.

Dear Chairman, thank you. I listened carefully to the whole discussion and I really thank everyone for their support, for the comments. Some discussions I would not comment at all because I think they have said everything through their discussions, and even by choosing words, absolutely inappropriate to such an institution. I will only say that we must not look at equality through one narrow lens, because discrimination is happening today. We haven't eradicated the violence yet. We do not even have sufficient political participation of women in political life, etc., etc. And we could enumerate through many areas of society and life. And now it's an ideology to some of the colleagues here. All right, let them have it, but I'm telling them from here that all of us who normally, that normally, think we're going to support this report because it's our responsibility. It is our responsibility to ensure equality, freedom and to protect women in every aspect of our society and life. Thank you and thank you for your support.

Today, the Honourable Chair, the Honourable Commissioners, the Honourable Colleagues and the Members of Parliament, we are facing an extremely important debate and document that will determine whether, as the European Parliament, as Members of Parliament, as citizens of Europe, we are ready to clearly and loudly defend our fundamental values and build a European Union of equality and equality. This isn't just an ordinary report, but it's also not a list of nice wishes. This document contains our main demands and priorities in the field of women's rights and gender equality, but it is also an analysis of the defeats so far which have led to the fact that today our fellow citizens across Europe are not safe, free or equal. But he's also a sign of how to make it right. The year is 2025 and we are at a turning point. Not just as a community, but as a world. And although we have won countless battles for equality, many of them fought in this very house, today across Europe we feel an attack of backsliding, questioning the fundamental human rights and freedoms and shouts of those who would bring us back to darkness. This backsliding is no longer a distant threat today; it is there, in our cities, on our streets, online, in schools and in our media, and even within these institutions. We look at how the rights we considered unquestionable are being undermined: the right to liberty, bodily autonomy, the right to work, the right to live without fear, violence and discrimination. Anti-gender movements, misogyny, discrimination and well-organised and funded forces spreading disinformation do only one thing: They try to convince us that gender equality is not a fundamental value, but an ideology. That these are not discussions about, for example, the right to health, to safety from violence or to equal pay for equal work. All this is undermined by expressions such as ‘gender ideology’, ‘woke movement’ and similar fabrications that have no place on the margins, let alone in the political mainstream. That is why the text before you, which we have negotiated for a long time and very difficult, is a resistance to such initiatives. First: violence. One in three women in the European Union has experienced violence. It's an epidemic. We welcome the Anti-Violence Directive adopted in the last mandate, but the paper does not stop the bully - this is the implementation. In this document, we therefore call on all Member States: Stop stalling! Implement the Directive in its entirety, from prevention to victim protection. To prevent this, it is essential to teach young people about consent and to provide a clear legal framework based on an approach: Just YES means YES. Second: Autonomy of the body. We must not be afraid to say: Sexual and reproductive health are human rights. In the 21st century, no woman in Europe should die for being deprived of a fundamental right. The right to decide on one's own body is the foundation of women's freedom. We therefore ask the Commission to stop hiding behind national competence arguments and to ensure universal access to SRHR for every woman and girl in the Union. Initiative My voice, my choice One way to ensure this is to call on the Commission to comply with their request. It is time to protect our fellow citizens from discriminatory national health systems, from misogynistic governments, from the interference of religious dogmas in legislation. Third: we cannot build a strong, competitive Europe if women's work remains invisible, less paid or overburdened. The gap in wages and pensions is not only unfortunate statistics, it is systemic injustice. This is the result of society as a whole valuing women-dominated jobs - such as care, cleanliness, education - as less valuable. This is why we are calling for the European Care Strategy to be transformed into a strong European care legislation. We need to invest in affordable, high-quality childcare and care services for the elderly. This is crucial if we want an equal Europe. Fourth: The digital world has become an extremely dangerous place for women. Under the guise of the free development of technology, we have created a monstrous situation in which it is quite normal to spread lies, disinformation online, to expose women and girls to attacks, harassment, online violence. Algorithms that incite discrimination and hatred, AI tools used to create violent and degrading content, social networks that rage. It is time to stop the big players in the online world and make it clear that profit is not and cannot be ahead of the safety of our fellow citizens. The message for the end - tomorrow, when you vote in this document, you do not just vote on a series of recommendations. You are voting on what Europe will be like in the coming decade. Support this report and be on the right side of history. All the rest is the abandonment of fundamental European values.

In March 2025, the Commission published its Plan for Women's Rights, which includes a long-term political vision to advance women's rights. The Roadmap is accompanied by a Declaration of Principles for a Gender-Equal Society. In the Plan, the Commission invites all interested parties, in particular the Parliament and the Council, social partners, civil society actors and other relevant organisations, to support the principles included in the Declaration of Principles for a Gender-Equal Society annexed to the Plan in 2025. Over the past five years, the European Union has made historic progress by adopting a number of very significant pieces of legislation, such as on pay transparency, gender balance on company boards and the fight against violence against women. However, progress towards gender equality remains slow and we are also facing increasing attacks on women’s rights, gender equality and achieved human rights standards. That is why it is important that much more is done today, and the Plan should provide guidance for concrete actions in the new Gender Equality Strategy, of which I am the rapporteur. Parliament welcomes the adoption of the new Strategy and we are preparing our contribution through our own report on the Gender Equality Strategy 2025, which we will vote on next week in the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality and next month in plenary. When developing the new Gender Equality Strategy post-2025, we call on the Commission to take into account the views of Parliament that will be expressed in our upcoming resolution and to work together to ensure that Europe remains a global leader when it comes to human rights, when it comes to gender equality. To be able to say this, there are a few key things we need to protect and improve. First, women's sexual and reproductive health and rights. This is not a request for full access to these rights, including the right to abortion. We're not going to negotiate and bid here. The Commission must be very clear about this. Right to choose - always. Combating violence against women is an absolute priority. It is time to rectify some of the injustices of the past mandate, especially when it comes to rape and sexual violence, but also to improve legislation on the definition of gender-based violence and femicide. Furthermore, empowering women in the labour market and safe workplaces are not just good wishes. Today, women face harassment and violence in all areas, from public spaces to their workplace. We also need a new legal framework for care. Unregulated working conditions, precarious contracts, the burden predominantly on women, this is not a system that is acceptable. It's not a system we want to build together. At a time when we are increasing resources for defence and security, it is wrong to say that these priorities are at odds with those in the field of women's rights and social security. Increased spending and gender budgeting must become a reality, and it is also time to take a critical look at the allocation of funds so far, because how can it happen that the European Union gives its funds for some projects and programmes that are in conflict with the fundamental values of the European Union? They spread lies and disinformation about, for example, sexual and reproductive rights. This should be followed up and put an end to it immediately. Next, feminist foreign policy is not the kind of bauk some want to portray. It simply means a single political framework that places gender equality and the human rights of all women and marginalized groups at the centre of foreign policy goals, strategies and implementation. And finally, resistance to all those who violate fundamental values and freedoms and women's rights. Unfortunately, we know that such people also sit here in the European Parliament. In addition to all these priorities, in July this year the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality adopted a draft motion for a resolution on the Declaration of Principles for a Society with Gender Equality. In this draft, we welcome the Commission Communication of 7 March 2025 and consider that it is a good basis for the preparation of the upcoming Gender Equality Strategy, which still needs to go much further and provide concrete legislative measures to ensure protection and progress in the area of women’s rights and gender equality. The Committee also endorses the principles included in the Declaration accompanying the Commission Communication. However, all this without concrete measures means little, and Parliament will be presenting its own next week. Be assured that our requirements will be clear, concrete and focused on maximizing the protection and advancement of women's rights. I would therefore like to ask the Commission the following questions. How will the Commission ensure that Parliament’s positions in the area of women’s rights are presented alongside the Gender Equality Strategy post-2025? Parliament has repeatedly specifically called for new legislative proposals in the area of women’s rights and gender equality. What can we expect from the Commission in the upcoming strategy in this regard?

Dear Chairman, simplifying procedures and reducing administrative burdens is essential for our farmers. I hear the same thing on the ground every day: too much paper, too many rules, too little understanding for real life in the countryside. Our people want to work in the field, in the vineyard, in the barn, and not fill out the forms. In Croatia, for example, due to excessive bureaucracy, the use of funds for the wine sector barely exceeds 50 percent. Competitions are changing overnight, without clear instructions, and so we are forcing producers to give up farming, and now with all this the Commission is announcing fewer funds in the agricultural budget. I think it's the wrong and dangerous direction. If we want a strong European agriculture that produces domestic quality food, we need to free farmers from paperwork and give a greater role to those who can help - cooperatives, local action groups, local and regional authorities. The documents that we will vote on tomorrow I think are going in the right direction and I will support them. Our farmers need less paper and more support, understanding and respect.

Dear Chairman, June 2025 was one of the warmest in the history of measurement. Temperatures exceed 40 degrees, and one in five people in Europe do not have the opportunity to cool their home. It's not just a climate issue, it's a matter of social justice and equality. In Croatia, it is particularly dramatic in rural areas that make up 63 percent of the territory and are home to more than 40 percent of our citizens and are faced with depopulation and the departure of young people. People in these rural areas live in old houses without basic energy efficiency standards with high utility costs. That is why my position is clear, the new European Affordable Housing Plan must also have a specific component for rural areas, investments in renovation, energy efficiency and green infrastructure. As a Member of the European Parliament, I will fight for the entire Croatia, our cities and smaller rural areas to receive funding for these projects because the right to housing in decent conditions is a fundamental human right, and combating energy poverty must not come at the expense of citizens, but is the responsibility of politics and our obligation.

Dear Chairman, at a time when trade conflicts are booming around the world, agriculture has been hit hardest, from Mercosur, through a new agreement with the United States, so here's China's imposition of tariffs on pork and pig products. The situation is increasingly alarming for our farmers. The decision coming from China will have serious consequences for the pig sector in the European Union, as China has been one of the key export destinations for European pork in recent years. Surpluses will pile up, prices will fall, and the sector will suffer. And it is important to say that this decision from China is completely unjustified because Union pigmeat producers do not participate in anti-dumping practices and have fully cooperated with the investigations and with all requests of the Chinese authorities. We urgently need measures to counter the negative consequences of these latest tariffs, as well as a trade strategy that puts agricultural production at the centre because without farmers there is no food and without food there is no security, and therefore protecting domestic agricultural production must be our priority.

Dear Chairman, imagine a picture of people in black who would ban cultural manifestations because they are bothered by anti-fascism, then threats at the writer's house because he has an opinion that they do not like, then a call to the lynch of a politician who defends him; In public space, a fascist greeting is shouted, and all who condemn it are called a lack of patriotism. It is a picture of the summer of 2025 in Croatia. What does the government do? She doesn't react, she doesn't condemn, she just incoherently reaches out. In a country that has anti-fascism in its constitution, today we witness the revival of the Ustasha, the Croatian version of fascism. This poses a threat not only to Croatia, but to the entire European Union. And we're not the only ones. Anti-fascism is the property of civilization, the greats used to say. Let us not forget their words and let the dark ideologies of the past become our reality in the future.

The Common Agricultural Policy is a cornerstone and a key pillar when it comes to European food security, the future of production and the sustainability of agriculture. It also plays a key role in preserving rural areas. All this is now under scrutiny if the announcements we hear from the Commission on merging the CAP with other financial instruments materialise. This is not about any simplification, revision or coordination. That's not a technical question. This is a decision that, should it occur, puts our agricultural producers and consumers at risk. This, combined with the EU-Mercosur agreement, in which the agricultural sector is sacrificed to some other sectors, seriously undermines the sustainability of European agricultural production. I renew my appeal to the Commission not to overthrow one of the most successful and important policies for the whole of Europe and to work together to ensure a single, increased and stable agricultural policy budget. Our farmers deserve it.

Honourable chair, rural areas make up most of the territory of the European Union and are one of the most important sources of resources, from agriculture, cultural content to tourism. However, we still face a lack of investment in infrastructure. Public transport, housing, healthcare, as well as digital infrastructure, in particular high-speed internet, are particularly prominent here. In 2025, when most of Europe uses AI every day, some of our fellow citizens in rural communities do not have access to the internet. That is why I am pleased to see the growing calls for rural areas to be digitalised, but such requests must be accompanied by concrete financial resources. I have worked on digitalization and the introduction of high-speed internet for several years, as the mayor of a smaller city, and we are among the first to start such projects together with the Krapina-Zagorje County, which was named the European Entrepreneurial Region for this year. And I am glad that thanks to these activities, access to high-speed internet is soon becoming a reality for a large number of citizens. It's good when national initiatives catch up with local levels and support our projects, no matter how late.

The housing crisis in the European Union is becoming deeper every day, and affects young people the most. Research conducted in Croatia shows that as many as 70% of young people cannot afford to rent or buy an apartment. The main reasons for the inability to finance independent housing are low incomes, high rental and utility costs and high living costs caused by inflation. Nearly half of young people said that buying is possible, but only with the financial support of parents, partners or through credit. However, young people have proposals for solutions and expect concrete measures from us. They are primarily seeking an improvement in credit conditions and an increase in government subsidies for the purchase of the first real estate. 56% believe that we need to regulate the rental market through price caps. Dear colleagues, it is time to listen to young people and offer concrete solutions and stop the market rampage. Housing is not a mechanism for profit, but a fundamental human right.

At the beginning, I would like to thank Commissioner Lahbib, who was in charge of the processes surrounding the text of this roadmap for women's rights, but I would like to thank our colleague, Commissioner Roxana Mînzat, who is here with us today and who has fought vigorously for all the priorities important for girls and women across Europe to be part of this vision. The text that is actually presented is good and shows that despite the resistance we have at the highest levels in the Commission, there is enough strength to protect women's rights and to improve them. But we need to be aware that this text is just a drawing of a kind of vision and that we have only a real job ahead of us in the new gender equality strategy. This strategy must include concrete commitments and proposals and tangible legislative and non-legislative measures. In addition, what is important to say is that the strategy needs to be accompanied by very concrete financial resources and we will seek a separate and clear budget line to deliver on all priorities in the field of gender equality, because in the times as they are today, full of instability and channelling funds towards defence and security, it is important to stress that gender equality is one of the fundamental conditions for social security and progress. We will not allow this topic to be marginalized and efforts in this part to be diminished or neglected. Be sure of that.

Dear Chair, when discussing this agreement on MERCOSUR, we should also take into account the specificities of smaller countries, such as Croatia, where the skeleton of agriculture is actually small farmers and they will be most affected by this agreement - various sectors, from cattle breeding, arable farming, poultry farming, and even winemaking, where I am aware that a large market is opening up, primarily for the wine industry of large countries, i.e. the market of MERCOSUR. However, what worries me is the possibility that we will be flooded with cheap wines of questionable quality from South America and thus - and in combination with what the wine sector is facing today, and these are, I will remind you, vine diseases, that the European Commission is again announcing schemes grubbing up-a, that is, grubbing up vineyards - can create numerous dangers for the wine sector in smaller countries such as Croatia, I repeat, which has no problems with overproduction, where small winemakers form the basis of this production and which wants to protect and develop its indigenous varieties.

Today, reality is a system in which housing, instead of law, has become a mechanism for profit. When discussing the issue of housing policy, it should be recalled that Europe is not just an urban part. It is made up not only of the cities of the European metropolis, but also of rural areas, which cover 83% of the territory of the European Union. There are 137 million people living there. They also struggle with the issue of housing availability and affordability, as well as with the issue of energy sustainability. In addition to rural areas, one of the groups that suffers the greatest consequences of the housing crisis are young people. That is why without concrete financial programmes and support, young people will not be able to afford their own roof over their heads. I am here again urging the Commission and the Commissioner for Housing not to forget our rural areas and our young people when designing their housing strategy, as they are the most valuable asset Europe has.

When we talk about the priorities of the European Union for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, we must be aware of the socio-political context in which the session will take place. It is undeniable that we are far from achieving the goal of the five sustainable development goals on equality and that, if we continue at this pace, it will take many years for us to achieve full gender equality. At the same time, we are faced with many initiatives at European and global level that seek to aggravate the situation of women. We are constantly witnessing how the achieved women's rights are questioned and limited. Some of the colleagues in this Parliament are leading the way, and this is a disgrace to them. The rights of women and girls are not something that we will open a debate about here or anywhere else and allow you to relativize and deny them. We will fight it by all means. Our main message as the European Union at the UN Commission must be clear and loud: full commitment to the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. This means continuing to develop a legal framework that will guarantee the rights of all women and girls across Europe and the world, with strong resistance to those who trample on these rights.

Dear Chairman, Commissioner Hansen, about 40 million jobs today in the European Union depend on agriculture. 93% of agricultural operators are family farms. In my country, Croatia, of the 170,000 registered farmers of family farms, there are about 160,000. From these figures it is clear that family farms are the cornerstone of European agricultural production. Consequently, our actions to improve working conditions and rights must recognise the multiple problems they face. For example, to facilitate and simplify processes in agricultural activities, to ensure adequate income and to protect the rights of all agricultural workers to the highest standards. Also, let us not forget that one of the fundamental objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy is to ensure a fair standard of living for farmers. Safe and fair working conditions are a prerequisite for this, as well as improving the quality of life of farmers through better public services and adequate infrastructure in rural communities. The European Union must stand behind its farmers.

Every year 2,300 women are killed in Europe by a partner or ex-partner. I will repeat that one in three women has been the victim of physical or psychological violence, that one in two women has experienced some form of sexual harassment. It is a reality in Europe today, a black and terrible reality that can and should be prevented by better laws, more effective prevention mechanisms and strong penalties. Unfortunately, the Istanbul Convention did not come to life in Europe as we had hoped. Why? Because some Member States, instead of focusing on fighting violence, focus on imaginary enemies, hidden in the so-called gender ideology. Correcting the failure to implement the Istanbul Convention in the European Union, a new directive on combating violence against women was adopted. And that text was targeted by absurd criticism. That is why, for example, EU standardisation has been omitted when it comes to the crime of rape, and it is important to emphasize that sexual violence in Europe is on the rise. Statistics show that there are over 230 000 cases every year at European level. The responsibility to change that lies with all of us.

Dear President, colleagues, if we care about every citizen and every area of the European Union, then we must dedicate the same importance to smaller urban centres, rural units, mountainous areas, islands, border areas, as we dedicate it, for example, to large cities. Today, unfortunately, this is not the case and we do not have balanced regional development. Croatia stands out because all of these areas face serious problems, from the lack of affordable housing, poor public transport, which hinders access to education, health services and the labour market, to deficient infrastructure. Young people are leaving these areas, and local governments do not have the fiscal capacity to address these challenges. I know that very well as mayor of Pregrada. That is why cohesion policy must offer solutions through the financing of local and regional projects. Cooperation between all levels of government and simplified access to these funds can significantly improve the situation. Our smaller urban centres, rural communities of the region are the solution, not the problem. It is time to provide them with the necessary financial resources.

Honourable colleagues, rural areas make up 83% of the territory of the European Union and are home to 137 million people. These areas are crucial for the production of basic resources such as food and energy. Nevertheless, despite their importance, rural communities are systematically marginalised through concrete policies and funding programmes. Yes, there are documents such as the Rural Pact and the Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas, which are good guidelines, but their implementation is slow and problems are accumulating. Emigration, lack of public services, inadequate infrastructure are the everyday life of local communities in rural areas, and the lack of support from higher levels of government creates an unsustainable situation. Today, rural Europe is also facing natural disasters due to climate change, from landslides, droughts, floods to earthquakes and fires. And for such situations, we need faster and simpler financial mechanisms. This is why it is essential to provide direct and easily accessible European funds to ensure the development and sustainability of rural areas and the survival of people in them.