Speeches

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, as Vice-President of the Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula of the European Parliament, I am today presenting an urgent resolution to condemn the systematic violation of human rights that is taking place in North Korea. The past few months have been especially dramatic for North Koreans, and reports of abuse, beatings and unjustified detentions are on the rise. The European Union must be strong and uncompromising towards the Kim Jong-un regime, and that is why this resolution demands that the international community hold accountable those responsible for this barbarism. As democratic representatives of the citizens of the European Union, we can no longer look the other way: we cannot ignore the fact that the North Korean regime is repressing political freedom of thought, conscience, religion, expression and the press with extreme violence; we cannot ignore the very high levels of malnutrition and medical neglect suffered by the population for years; we cannot ignore the extreme violence and slavery in the country's prisons and re-education camps; We cannot ignore their constant military and nuclear provocations and intimidations, and we cannot ignore the suffering of women and girls in North Korea, a country where state officials not only fail to protect their people, but perpetuate gender-based violence, sexual abuse and inequality. Tomorrow, by voting on this resolution, we will demonstrate that this Parliament looks at this reality head on, that we condemn it in the most absolute terms and that we demand an immediate end to these heartbreaking violations of human rights.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, if we talk about innovation, Europe needs more than ever to open up to the world, exchange knowledge and cooperate with those nations that can broaden our scientific, humanistic and technological horizon. The text we are debating today establishes the strategy of cooperation with other nations, partners and allies with whom we must advance in all kinds of knowledge, but paying special attention to the great challenges: green transition, digitalisation and health. We also made clear the need to strengthen ties with Ukraine's academic sector and scientists. Horizon Europe funds should serve to create common projects with our neighbouring country in the coming years. Another major priority is the protection of academic freedom. Europe must build its future around critical thinking and, therefore, we cannot tolerate freedom in educational institutions being jeopardised or called into question. Finally, I want to highlight three keys of the text that I think are fundamental: explicit promotion of gender equality in R&D teams, cooperation with our Mediterranean partners on hydrogen and R&D collaboration in semiconductors, an essential axis of our digital sovereignty.

. – Madam President, we meet again at a time that defines European history. The terrible invasion of Ukraine, with millions of women and children fleeing the country, forces us to react, to move fast, and puts our solidarity to the test again. I am glad to see that Europe will not disappoint. Congratulations, Commissioner, because if Europe is to be useful, it has to be flexible, and today, with cohesion policy, we are showing that. This initiative, which we are adopting today, CARE, will enable the European regions to finance all the expenditure arising from the humanitarian crisis. We're talking about education, field hospitals, shelters... In short, we talk about integration. But this initiative, as it stands today, is not enough. First, more funding is needed for border regions. Two million refugees have arrived in Poland alone. Secondly, we must review the deadlines we are giving to the regions in order to be able to justify the expenditure: I hope it is not necessary, but everything seems to indicate that this crisis will continue beyond the summer. And, third, we must also support those who are suffering the most from the collateral damage of this invasion. We're already seeing it: SMEs and families are unable to cope with the unstoppable rise in fuel and energy prices. A dramatic situation that is a new blow to the countryside, to the carriers and to the industry. That funds reach businesses and families will be key for society to endure the onslaught of the war economy. The brave Ukrainians and the countries hosting them need us and standing with them will be a test of solidarity and strength for the whole European Union.

Madam President, Commissioner, the European Union has set out to be a benchmark in the battery industry. A key piece in our fight for strategic autonomy. In 2030 we want 30 million electric vehicles to circulate on our roads and these figures imply an exponential increase in strategic materials such as lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, on which Europe is poor and on which we depend completely on imports. In 2020 alone we will need 18 times more lithium or 5 times more cobalt. Therefore, if we want to ensure our strategic autonomy, we need to incentivise and develop an industry in Europe that uses the principles of circularity as the main lever. And for this we need a regulatory framework, new rules of the game that guarantee the regulation and legal certainty of the entire value chain. And this is what today's proposal proposes. We comprehensively regulate the entire product lifecycle, from design to end-of-life, to make batteries more sustainable and competitive. I think this is an ambitious proposal. Requirements on the content of recycled material of batteries are introduced, more ambitious collection measures; We regulate the second life of electric vehicle batteries, the millions of batteries we will have so that they can have other uses, and a battery passport is implemented that reflects their carbon footprint so that their environmental impact is also transparent. Of course, environmental sustainability must go hand in hand with the social dimension. The elimination of worker abuse and the use of child labour in mines must be ensured. Thank you, sheriff. I believe that with this legislation today we are taking a big step forward. We are ambitious and give a strong signal in Europe to accelerate our energy independence.

Mr President, Commissioner, we in Europe can no longer accept our dependence on Russian gas as inevitable. After the historical escalation of the last few days, it is urgent to prevent the continued use of gas as a political weapon. Commissioner, we need concrete measures to alleviate the electricity bill of homes and businesses that are now paying an unaffordable record price. We ask you for a proposal to temporarily modify the energy pricing system. In times of war, extraordinary measures are needed to put an end to Putin's blackmail. And, in addition, we have to address another of our great weaknesses: lack of energy interconnections. In that sense, I believe that Spain can and should play a key role in this crisis. Today I sent a letter to the Government of my country to recover the Midcat project on interconnection with France. We have a great capacity for regasification and a direct connection with Africa; Not betting decisively on this would be irresponsible for the whole of Europe.

Madam President, Commissioner, the Cohesion Funds were created to build a fairer Europe. We cannot let the bureaucracy turn this magnificent tool into a problem. The COVID crisis has already caused us to change our view of cohesion policy and we were able to adapt funds to the urgent needs of the pandemic. Now we need to adapt to a new crisis. The war is going to affect us tremendously. We are facing unprecedented increases in energy prices, supply problems and the arrival of hundreds of thousands of refugees we need to help. The Commission's idea of supporting the refugee crisis with the remnants of the previous period is an appropriate but clearly insufficient idea, Commissioner. We need to present a new emergency instrument for Ukraine that will support refugees and also European businesses and families most affected by the crisis. I would like to know your position on this. Don't you think that, as we did during COVID, now is the time for us to support the regions most affected by the crisis in Ukraine with the funds of the new period? On the other hand, and as you well know, there is another matter that concerns me. Last November, the Director-General of the Commission's DG for Regional and Urban Policy identified Spain as the most backward country in the entire European Union in the development of cohesion policy for the new period. The warning was useless. We still have not presented even a draft of the Association Agreement and, with the low economic growth we have, this situation is very serious and we risk losing an annuity of funds. We're not the only country. I would like to know what the Commission is going to do: is it going to be more flexible with deadlines or is it going to condemn Member States that are late to lose an annuity? I would also like to ask you what the Commission can do to provide technical support so that States are not overrun administratively.

Madam President, today I would like to address all those people who struggle with cancer every day, and their families, who support them and suffer as their own the ravages of this disease. Today's message is clear: This Parliament is going to stand up for you. Because the report that is adopted today is not a declaration of intent, it is a project with concrete measures to pool resources in research and to be able to deal, for example, with rare cancers, pediatric cancers or those that are more difficult to cure. It is a plan for Member States to invest in prevention, screening and better care. A direct support to health systems, to our professionals. And inequalities have no place here, only the highest quality care regardless of borders: that a patient from Poland, Romania, France or Spain has the same opportunities to overcome the disease. To all of you, I say that the fight against cancer will continue to be a top priority for this Parliament. Let there be no doubt in your mind. Thank you very much, dear Véronique, for your involvement.

Madam President, Commissioner, rapporteur, how many citizens did the messenger RNA technique sound to two years ago? Or who knew who Biotech was a few months before the pandemic? The importance of the pharmaceutical sector and biotechnological innovation is out of the question. Its success in recent months has gone hand in hand with ours, and the development in record time of a vaccine, which has freed us from the worst of the pandemic, has not been the result of chance: It has been years of research away from the spotlight, close collaboration and public-private investment, and the work of some of the world's best researchers on vaccine ingredients. In this House we have discussed talent, innovation and technology on numerous occasions. Today, with this pharmaceutical strategy, we take another step to protect the companies and researchers that have given the face and recover the competitiveness of a strategic industry of which Europe was once a leader, because, today, we are far from being autonomous in the pharmaceutical field: only 60% of the medicines we consume are produced in the European Union and 80% of the active ingredients come from China and India. To regain this leadership, we need, first of all, to provide the industry with sufficient legal certainty to encourage it to invest the time and enormous resources needed to develop new medicines. And protecting innovative SMEs is critical because, after all, for many years their only asset has been intellectual property. We must also focus on the technologies of the future, nanotechnology, gene therapy, artificial intelligence and creating a European health data space that reflects the excellence of our health systems. My second point leads me to drugs that are not profitable, such as pediatrics or those that treat diseases such as ALS. From Europe, we do not forget those who suffer from these diseases, and this is where we must solve the market failures, bet on a system of incentives that works and, above all, support research with public investment. Let's use recovery plans, cohesion funds and innovation programmes like Horizon Europe. Of course, we have to put the citizen at the centre of this whole debate. Two-speed Europe must be avoided at all costs. A very illustrative example: a patient today, in northern Europe, takes on average between 100 and 200 days to have access to a new medicine; the same patient in Eastern Europe would take between 600 and 1000 days. We have to tackle this problem because, in the health field, these disparities cost lives. Finally, this strategy must serve to learn from the mistakes of the past, to make sure that we are prepared to face future crises, and now is the time for the Commission to present an early warning mechanism to avoid shortages of medicines and to bet on administrative solutions that have proven useful, such as rapid approvals or the joint purchase of critical materials. Let us continue to show that the European Union provides solutions. Dear colleagues, Europe is the continent with the highest life expectancy, a great achievement that says a lot about our health and pharmaceutical systems. It is essential to ensure the sustainability of this system and that the next health crisis finds us with the duties done. This is the best favor we can do for future generations.