| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas SIEPER | Germany DE | Non-attached Members (NI) | 239 |
| 2 |
|
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN | Finland FI | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 219 |
| 3 |
|
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR | Spain ES | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 200 |
| 4 |
|
João OLIVEIRA | Portugal PT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 148 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS | Lithuania LT | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 146 |
| 6 |
|
Maria GRAPINI | Romania RO | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 121 |
| 7 |
|
Seán KELLY | Ireland IE | European People's Party (EPP) | 92 |
| 8 |
|
Evin INCIR | Sweden SE | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 91 |
| 9 |
|
Ana MIRANDA PAZ | Spain ES | Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA) | 87 |
| 10 |
|
Michał SZCZERBA | Poland PL | European People's Party (EPP) | 79 |
All Contributions (47)
Addressing EU demographic challenges: towards the implementation of the 2023 Demography Toolbox (debate)
Date:
22.01.2025 14:42
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we are here to discuss how to deal with the demographic challenges facing the European Union. As you herd in the dark, let's look around: Europe is already changing face. Mohammed is already the most used name for children in Brussels, Oslo, Berlin and England. In France, almost 30% of new births involve the use of names of Muslim origin. In Molenbeek, Brussels, of the top ten most common names of newborns, nine are Muslims. The Europe we know today will no longer exist. The future that awaits us will be characterized by a panorama consisting of minarets and Islamic veils everywhere. European Judeo-Christian roots will be replaced by cultures that do not belong to us. An Islamized Europe for Muslims is a dream, a nightmare for us. What does Europe do? It pretends not to see and, indeed, with its policies favors immigration and therefore substitution.
Geopolitical and economic implications for the transatlantic relations under the new Trump administration (debate)
Date:
21.01.2025 14:28
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, today, the day after Donald Trump took office, there are long faces here in the European Parliament, faces of people who are shocked by the inauguration speech. But what did he ever say? He said all the right things that we can share and that we should do too. For example, Trump talks about repatriating irregular immigrants: Instead, here the left is talking about giving away citizenships. Talk about defending national borders: instead, in Europe we had someone like Matteo Salvini who risked jail for defending European borders. Talk about using all available energy resources, including oil and gas: Here, on the other hand, we are moving forward with the Green Deal that is sinking businesses. It is contrary to ideology. woke: Here, in Brussels, we are succumbing to political correctness. He says that American citizens will be able to buy the car they want: Right thing, but the Europeans don't, because here you continue with the obligation of the electric car from 2035. In short, on the one hand Trump's revolution, on the other an embarrassing immobility.
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Date:
20.01.2025 20:42
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen: women to be abused and subjugated. It is the vision that is spreading more and more among young people in Islamic communities. I wonder: When will you open your eyes? I want to read you the dramatic testimony of a young Englishwoman, one of the victims of group violence on New Year's Eve in Piazza del Duomo in Milan. He said: There were 40 disgusting men harassing me. I had to fight to survive. These are his words. Group harassment by immigrants of Islamic faith against a dozen girls according to an Arab rite called "taharrush gamea". This is not the first time: How to forget the horror of New Year's Eve 2016 in Cologne? Then we had similar cases in Hamburg, Zurich, Salzburg, Helsinki and then again in Milan, on New Year's Eve, in 2022. You are pretending nothing because you should mea culpa about the damage of immigration and failed integration in so many European countries. When will you understand that we are facing an emergency?
Heat record year 2024 - the need for climate action to fight global warming (debate)
Date:
20.01.2025 18:13
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the first plenary day of the first plenary session in 2025. So, we are talking about very important issues. And what is the priority for you? The priority is the record heat of 2024, the warmest year on record. So for you, again and again, it is the call for climate action to combat global warming – this is the title of the debate. What does it mean, however, in essence? More Green Deal and therefore more mazzate to the European economy. You really don't want to realize that you're making a blatant mistake. But, I say: Have you ever looked at the numbers? No, because Europe accounts for just 8-9 % of global emissions: Even if we reset ours, nothing would change. And yet, to be the first in the class, you have imposed ideological rules that no one follows, let alone China. In the meantime, however, you will remove funds from businesses, health and education. For what? Not at all. And in the meantime, did you know that global coal consumption reached its all-time high in 2024? Yes, because China consumes and produces more coal than anyone else, burning one in three tons of coal extracted in the world to power its own power plants. And then there is the electric car, your obsession, driven by a Europe that is scourged to give Beijing global dominance driven by coal. A masterpiece of contradictions. You will not convince us with this exasperated and almost grotesque climate terrorism. It's your fault what's happening, all yours.
The increasing and systematic repression of women in Iran
Date:
27.11.2024 18:41
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the repression of women in Iran is ruthless: Arbitrary arrests, brutal violence and even executions are commonplace. Women's rights are being systematically crushed because of religious motivations linked to Islam. It is crucial to emphasize that the engine of this terror is radical Islam and the spread of sharia. It is unfortunate to note that in this House the Left is hesitant to recognise this clearly: I see the benches of the left completely empty. Then, I don't know, they probably don't care what's happening to women in Iran. Condemning the Iranian regime is a necessary step, but it is not enough. We must also firmly oppose the imposition of the Islamic headscarf, which remains a symbol of oppression for women. And feminists: Where are those who fill the squares, often by the way, to denounce the patriarchy? Why don't they take to the streets to raise their voices against certain Islamic communities that treat women as objects? Why are they silent in the face of the atrocities suffered by Iranian women? Why are they absent from this House today?
Presentation by the President-elect of the Commission of the College of Commissioners and its programme (debate)
Date:
27.11.2024 10:32
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, we proudly say 'no' to Ursula von der Leyen. "No" to this majority, "no" to this European Commission. We say this because the world is changing direction but the European Union, inexplicably, insists on wrong policies that are weakening it. In the United States, with Trump's victory, the aim is to stop conflicts, to put an end to political climate madness, to streamline the oppressive bureaucratic machine and to reduce the fiscal burden. In Brussels, on the contrary, it pushes to fuel wars, to multiply policies green Disastrous and to impose an obsessive regulation that suffocates businesses and families. Entire sectors are being ruined, such as the European car industry, which is already on its knees. We have already had the von der Leyen experience and it turned out to be a failure, as confirmed by the voters themselves. Europe deserves better. Europe must change course. Europe must change now.
International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate)
Date:
25.11.2024 17:47
| Language: IT
Thank you for your question. Look, what do I do? I certainly do too little but at the moment too little is risking my life. I am under guard, I live under guard because I dared to say in this plenary, among other things, that the Islamic veil is not a symbol of freedom but of submission. But I am not afraid and therefore, precisely because I believe in this battle, I will continue to say what I think, with good peace of those like you, to whom this speech annoys, because you lose votes.
International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate)
Date:
25.11.2024 17:44
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, every day the news is filled with heartbreaking stories. But there is an even more painful truth: When the victims are Islamic girls beaten, abused or even killed, a shameful silence falls. So I wonder, why do you close your eyes? Why do you ignore the broken lives of young women forced into violence just because they want to take off their headscarves, want to live freely, wear make-up or love whoever they want? I find this absolutely intolerable. These girls cry freedom but only find indifference. And the response of the left, feminists and even this institution, what is it? Silence, censorship. I say, instead, shame! It's time to stop hiding these atrocities so as not to disturb your comfortable tale of positive integration. One cannot turn a blind eye to the problem of Islamic patriarchy just so as not to displease certain communities. And do you know why you do it? For electoral reasons: You're trampling on women's rights to get votes, and that's unworthy, indecent behavior! We are at a crucial crossroads: What kind of Europe do we want to build? I do not want a Europe where women are submissive, where sharia law finds space, where the Islamic veil becomes the symbol of our future! I want a free Europe, where women can live without being oppressed, without being reduced to objects! No more silence! No more compromises on women's skin: It's time to raise your voice and fight for your freedom.
UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29) (debate)
Date:
13.11.2024 18:17
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, while the world is moving in a completely different direction, as evidenced by Trump's victory, you continue, even at COP29, to pursue eco-fundamentalism and mind-blowing strategies of economic degrowth. When you realize that your policies green Does it only lead to job losses? When will you understand that imposing ever higher climate targets makes no sense, considering that Europe contributes only 7-8 % of global emissions? When will you understand that if 75% of emissions come from Asia and developing countries, that's where we need to act? When will you admit that fueling terror with phrases like "climate catastrophe" or "planet on fire" makes you, as it were, unbelievable? When will you reverse policies that lead to the demolition of our industry, effectively handing us over to China? Wake up before it's too late.
EU-US relations in light of the outcome of the US presidential elections (debate)
Date:
13.11.2024 17:38
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Trump did not win, he won! With good peace to all those on the left who have been gnawing for several days now; You should know that in pharmacies in Italy practically finished the Maalox, because all the communists went there with stomach pain. Your arrogance is also over, so much so that today we are here to discuss relations between Europe and the United States of America. Too bad we do this while we have hearings going on, where someone like Ribera, who is running to be Vice President of the Commission, said beautiful words about Trump, of the type that "he is illiterate". In short, there are all the foundations for solid relationships and healthy communication between the different institutions! You have lost, you have lost Kamala, you have lost the Democrats, but they have lost your policies, your policies on immigration and the environment, your proximity to China, your language. woke. Yet here you continue to perch on the same identical positions. Stop: Trump’s victory is not a defeat – even if you see it as a nightmare – it is actually a great, great, opportunity.
Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU citizens (debate)
Date:
21.10.2024 17:10
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the European institutions have decided to entrust Enrico Letta with the task of writing a report on the future of Europe. Eh, nothing, it already makes you laugh like that. Letta is the former leader of the Democratic Party, former premier of the left in Italy, the leading face of European socialists: represents virtually all those responsible for the disaster of the European Union in recent years, among other things soundly defeated in Italy. For Letta, the green transition is indispensable and we need to accompany farmers, businesses, the car industry: This is exactly what the majority did not do. Indeed, thanks to you, these sectors are in crisis. Letta reminds us that Europe must not give in to its leading role in manufacturing: But it is precisely because of the constraints, taxes and bureaucracy that Europe wants that we find ourselves in this situation. Enrico Letta: one who has a strange concept of democracy and wanted us to say that the cordon sanitaires are fundamental to stopping the right. He, precisely he, who reiterated that more regular migrants are needed for development, going against several countries, including socialists, who finally say that immigration must be stopped. In short, do we really want to be taught by Letta, the one who says that the former Minister Fornero was an excellent minister when instead he only destroyed our country?
Protecting the EU budget and ensuring that EU funds do not benefit entities or individuals linked to terrorist or Islamist movement (debate)
Date:
09.10.2024 20:13
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Europe is fighting Islamic extremism in words and then supporting it in practice. We have long denounced the incredible series of funding to realities close to Islamic radicalism. For example, the Commission recently announced the renewal of the Erasmus+ programme with the Islamic University of Science and Technology in Gaziantep, Turkey, a university that paid homage, speaking of martyrdom, to the Hamas leader killed at the end of July, a university that had rectors who spread radical Islamist ideas. In addition, 1.7 million euros were granted between 2014 and 2022 to the Islamic University of Gaza with the cooperation program, a university founded by the ideologue who built Hamas. Over the years we have also seen money to Turkish NGOs close to the Muslim Brotherhood and anti-Semitic compositions. Why does the money of European citizens end up in radical Islamist realities? Why do we finance those who cannot stand our values and our freedom? You are handing us over to Islamic extremists!
Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law
Date:
09.10.2024 19:48
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Iraq wants to impose an Islamic law to legalize paedophilia. They want to amend a 1959 law by legalizing child marriage, lowering the age of women to marry from 18 to 9 years. That sucks! Already today, 30% of women in Iraq are married under the age of 18. We're talking about legalizing the rape of girls. Five days ago the news of a woman kidnapped by ISIS in Iraq at the age of eleven, in 2014, moved to the Gaza Strip and forced to marry a man as a child. She was fortunately rescued by the Israeli army. But there is someone who really thinks that a dialogue with this mob is possible. Shame on you! Just shame! Long live freedom! Long live the freedom of women!
The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate)
Date:
08.10.2024 13:52
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the obligation since 2035 to sell only electric cars is utter madness. It is a short-sightedness of the European Union that leads the car industry to a very serious crisis. In 2023, the companies in the sector that closed were 13% more than in the previous year: closed factories, layoffs, unsold cars and corporate crises. Once the left was concerned with the poor and the working people: Well, the poor can't afford an electric car. As far as workers are concerned, there are 13 million workers in the sector: 750,000 jobs are at risk, all sacrificed on the altar of peace. green. The only ones to laugh and celebrate are the Chinese, with whom someone thought they could compete and that to produce our green There are more coal-fired power plants. Well, really compliments: A huge masterpiece! It's phenomenal!
The reintroduction of internal border controls in a number of Member States and its impact on the Schengen Area (debate)
Date:
07.10.2024 17:51
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, migrants are no longer resources and no one is talking about open doors in Europe anymore. It is the total failure of leftist policies, open doors, immigration and so on. Everyone, but everyone, in Europe, closes the doors to foreigners. There are those in France who want to pass laws to make arrivals more complicated. There are those who, like Germany, wake up and claim the right to send immigrants back home. Sweden has recently launched a package for the "re-immigration" of non-EU citizens. And the Netherlands also wants to suspend the right to asylum. Not even on the left they talk more about wanting to encourage immigration. The only nation to put a minister on trial for defending its borders and armoring its own country is Italy, with Matteo Salvini facing years in prison for doing what everyone in Europe wants to do today, namely defending borders. Here the danger is not the reintroduction of border control, but a Europe unable to take note of what is obvious to all: Immigration must be curbed seriously and drastically. Enough goodness, enough welcome at all costs, enough illegal immigrants.
Droughts and extreme weather events as a threat to local communities and EU agriculture in times of climate change (debate)
Date:
19.09.2024 07:25
| Language: IT
(IT) Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, my thoughts and solidarity go out to the people of Emilia Romagna, in Italy, who have been hit by bad weather at this time. Debating the consequences of drought, floods and extreme phenomena is important and it is the duty of Europe and the States to take care of the affected territories, but pointing the finger exclusively on man and climate change also takes away responsibility for those who, certain works, just do not want them. When it comes to drought, we have to go in the opposite direction to the ecologists' belief. To combat these phenomena we need more people, we need more jobs and more investments, we need more structures built on the territories, we need water basins, which environmentalists often oppose, while against floods we need containment tanks, mobile barriers and cleaning of the banks. And here, too, the left is often opposed. As for farmers, in recent years Europe has outrageously blamed them, pointing to them as enemies of the climate, when instead they are very important for the territories. Especially in these difficult times, they must be supported, because they are the ones who work the land, who take care of it – the real guardians of the territories. Ideology is enough: Seriousness and more responsibility are needed, including from the European institutions, to help the affected populations.
The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice”
Date:
18.09.2024 16:35
| Language: IT
I would like to ask you a question that I would like to ask all the members of the left: Is there a reason why you, in all your speeches, have never mentioned the Islamic religion, especially radical Islam? Why not understand the connection between these prohibitions, between the apartheid that women suffer there and radical Islam is not to see the problem, and sincerely makes a lot of sadness.
The deteriorating situation of women in Afghanistan due to the recent adoption of the law on the “Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice”
Date:
18.09.2024 16:11
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I wonder where feminists have gone. When it comes to women's rights in Islamic countries, they lose their voice, they shut up. I listened to the speeches of the left-wing MPs: Not a single one mentioned the Islamic term. What is happening in Afghanistan makes me shudder. I say this as a woman, first of all, as a free woman who has always fought for women's rights denied in Muslim-majority countries. The crimes, persecution, torture and arbitrary detention of Afghan women and girls by the Taliban regime is the lowest point of recent times. Have you read the new laws against women? They cannot move on their own, they cannot dress as they wish, they cannot attend high school, they cannot work outside the home, they cannot hold political positions, they must cover any part of their body and they cannot look directly at men not belonging to their family. They can't even make their voices heard in public, singing or acting. They are guilty of just one thing: to be women. All this takes place in the deafening silence of the European and Italian left, always ready to speak out of turn of patriarchy, but silent – absolutely silent – when radical Islam is involved. Silence also from feminist associations, more committed to crippling the endings of words than to dealing with gender violence and abuse. Too tiring or too uncomfortable to take to heart the complicated affairs of the women of Kabul – the Taliban, the burqa, sharia, beatings, submission. No indignation, no street demonstrations, no sermon on rights and equality violated. Shut up. Europe's failure to take a strong stance on Afghanistan suggests a tolerance towards a type of culture that does not belong to us and that is not compatible with our principles of democracy and freedom. You also demonstrate this by promoting the Islamic headscarf in the official communications of the European Commission. All this with the obvious consequence that the suburbs of the big cities are filling up with veiled women, even with the burqa. Even in schools, girls with headscarves are increasing. For us this oppression for religious reasons is unacceptable and we will continue to denounce it, even at the cost of taking threats, even of death. We're not afraid. I'm not afraid. We are ready to do our part. Europe cannot and must not look the other way.
One-minute speeches on matters of political importance
Date:
16.09.2024 20:42
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the car is in agony all over Europe. We need to change course on the electric to prevent disaster. Sales of battery-powered vehicles are languishing: They cost too much, they are uncomfortable, they do not convince consumers. European brands are in crisis and are also falling on the stock market: Volkswagen wants to close three plants, with 15,000 jobs at risk, Audi closes a factory in Belgium and Stellantis stops production in Turin due to lack of demand for the electric model of the 500. It is the failure of a European industrial policy. It is a real suicide for companies that have represented the great industry of our continent. You are destroying the car industry, do you want to understand it or not? Either you change the line, removing the ban on diesel and gasoline engines from 2035, or at least revising the dates, or you will only create unemployment and poverty.
Need to prevent security threats like the Solingen attack through addressing illegal migration and effective return (debate)
Date:
16.09.2024 19:01
| Language: IT
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, indiscriminate reception undermines society. Blocking it is neither racism nor Islamophobia: That's common sense. With unrestrained immigration, you have also opened Europe's door to terrorists. There is not only one obvious problem of asylum seekers planning to kill or slit the throats of those who welcomed them: There is a bigger issue called citizen safety. Now Chancellor Schulz says: Islamists threaten peaceful coexistence among all of us. And you're just noticing now? Well, "well woke up," let's say. And yet the signs have been everywhere for a long time: attacks, violent demonstrations, ghetto neighborhoods where the state does not exist, more and more extremists, including among young people, and more and more Islamic veils even in our cities, symbols of oppression of women for religious reasons. How long will Europe continue to submit to those who hate us?
Outcome of the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of EU Agriculture (debate)
Date:
16.09.2024 17:23
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, you have criminalised farmers for years and now you absolutely must change course. The farmers are not against the environment, but rather are decisive for the protection and development of the territories. Those who work the land cannot stand bureaucratic impositions and ecological follies that put their very survival at risk. In these years we should decide which agri-food strategy the European Union should pursue: a model made of links with tradition or a future of homologated and synthetic products? Europe has also fuelled unfair competition. The rules imposed on European producers must also apply to those who want to sell within the Union. We need reciprocity in imports from third countries and transparency on the label. We need to increase the budget for agriculture, not reduce it. We must defend our traditions, our food culture, starting with the Mediterranean diet, which, incredibly, is under attack.
Statement by the candidate for President of the Commission (debate)
Date:
18.07.2024 09:22
| Language: IT
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Madam President von der Leyen, I did not vote for you five years ago and today, listening to you, I repeat that I will not vote for you and I say so with conviction and pride! I was chosen by citizens to bring about change in Europe, not to support those who have been the protagonist of five years of disasters. He made a speech using only verbs to the future: We'll do, we'll do. I would like to inform you that you have already been President of the Commission for five years and the citizens have already judged you in the elections. The same citizens who are calling for a less ideological Europe that is closer to their needs. In his speech he proposes the same identical policies of the last five years: disastrous policies, starting with New Green Deal, with choices that put entire production chains in crisis. European citizens have asked for a change and how do you respond? With the same faces and the same policies. A logic of the perch, of the bunkers, embodied by its re-application. You failed. You, Ursula von der Leyen, failed. You are not the answer to Europe's problems, you are the cause.
Debate contributions by Silvia SARDONE