Debate contributions by Daniel BUDA

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, three thousand slaughtered animals, six million euros in compensation. These are not figures from a statistic, but the cruel reality in which French and European farmers live following the outbreak of lumpy skin disease in cattle. The new outbreak on the border with Spain is not just a local problem, an isolated crisis and no health accident. It is the direct consequence of a lack of anticipation, delayed decisions and European policies that too often react only after the damage is already irreversible. But it is a major test for the European Commission and for our collective ability to protect European agriculture. The question is simple and uncomfortable: How prepared are we in reality for diseases that decimate populations, destroy businesses and endanger food security and the future of future generations? The war stops at the border. Diseases, however, do not. They ignore maps, treaties and trade conventions. Compensation can mitigate short-term losses, but it is not a solution. They don't save farms, they don't rebuild herds. We need effective and proportionate interventions that protect animal health, but without destroying farmers' incomes. It is all the more serious because the vaccine exists but has not been used for commercial reasons, for fear of the impact on relations with third countries. The result? The disease has spread uncontrollably, wreaking havoc in some states and arousing - and I stress - horror throughout the European Union and the world of farmers. This is clear evidence that current biosecurity measures are insufficient. Without a real vaccine-based prevention strategy, however, we will continue to passively witness the mass slaughter of animals, with devastating effects not only on farmers but also on the internal market and the commercial credibility of the European Union. It is therefore time for a paradigm shift, from crisis management through financial compensation, to prevention, anticipation and above all to political responsibility.

Mr Sieper, both large farmers and small farmers are equally concerned about respecting environmental standards and, at the same time, it is precisely the European Commission that has come and is today proposing, proposing and I am convinced that it will propose further, that even the large farmers you are talking about should be incentivised in terms of complying with these environmental standards, because, I repeat, farmers are aware that only in an indestructible communion will they really be able to ensure the sustainability of their farmers, regardless of their size.

Mr. Sieper, thank you very much for this question. I want to tell you one thing: Today, farmers are the biggest and most important guardians of environmental protection. I guarantee you that every farmer is aware of what good collaboration and good respect for environmental rights mean, because it is the environment, after all, that gives the farmer sustainability. But at the same time, we must be aware that farmers must be paid for their work, because farmers cannot be asked to do more with less money. That is why it is very important to maintain this balance between what environmental protection means and payments to farmers.

Madam President, Commissioner Hansen, we appreciate this proposal from the European Commission and I congratulate the rapporteur Rodrigues, as well as the shadow rapporteur of the EPP, Dan Motreanu, and all the others involved in this file. Colleagues, we must recognise that today the common agricultural policy has become too complicated, too bureaucratic and too disconnected from the reality of European farmers. That is why it is time to move from a Europe of overregulation to a Europe of simplification, research and innovation. It is difficult to talk today about competitiveness, food security and generational renewal, when a farmer spends more time in front of the computer than in the field, or when minor mistakes lead to disproportionate sanctions. That is why I welcome the current simplification measures for farmers, whether we are talking about GAEC 1, 7 or 5, or rural start-ups and small farmers' businesses, which will be able to be financed with up to EUR 75 000, but also the reduction in the number of controls. At the same time, more than important is the possibility of purchasing animals with high genetic value from Pillar II of development. The current simplification of the CAP does not mean weakening European objectives, but must be a lesson for us, namely that farmers should not be listened to only when they are on the street. If we really want a strong Europe, we need to start with strong farmers, and that means a simple, fair, enforceable, but not least, adequately funded CAP now and in the future.

Mr President, I, too, congratulate the rapporteurs on their work, but, dear colleagues, today we are trying to respond to historic challenges with a budget created for a world that no longer exists. It was designed for a stable, predictable Europe and not for a Europe facing simultaneously a war on the continent, a recent pandemic, record inflation, explosive energy prices. That is why the 2026 allocations need to be closer to reality and more flexible. From an agricultural perspective, the realities cannot be challenged: We had, and still have, farmers on the street. They face major challenges, ranging from geopolitical turbulence, extreme weather events, market volatility and unacceptable rises in production costs. The war in Ukraine has put and is putting huge pressure on European farmers, and frontline states such as Romania are feeling this pressure more, and the European Commission must take these realities into account. The European Union budget must guarantee a decent living for farmers if we are to maintain food security and ensure reasonable prices for consumers. Farmers, beyond their role in providing food, have a strategic mission: to fight and keep rural communities alive and to fight against the depopulation of the most isolated areas. But, Commissioner Serafin, for this we must understand one thing: We can't do more with less money. We can't do the things we set out to do if we're not predictable. That is why I ask the European Commission to come up with a proposal to make these funds, whether we are talking about cohesion or the Common Agricultural Policy Pillar 2, for development, predictable for this beneficiary, because otherwise you understand that we will not be able to respond to these challenges that we are facing.

Mr President, Mr Hansen, thank you for the proposal. We also thank colleagues Rodrigues and Imart for their work, but, dear colleagues, today we are talking about simplifying a policy that, unfortunately, we have complicated ourselves. We can analyse why we have come here, to the point where farmers have had to cry out their helplessness in the street, but it is not the time to look for the culprits, but to act concretely so that they can continue their work today and tomorrow, and especially not to repeat the mistakes of the past. Agriculture is not just about farmers, as is sometimes misunderstood in this room by some colleagues, but it is about what we call Europe's food security, which means food in sufficient quantities and especially at affordable prices for consumers. Although agriculture accounts for only 2% of our economy, this sector is vital. More than 8.7 million people work in agriculture to feed more than 450 million European citizens. However, the gains in the agricultural sector are 40% lower than in other economic sectors, which is why we need to continue the simplification process even more intensively. We must go further, stop taxing agricultural subsidies and defend the strengthening of the position of European farmers in the food supply chain. Whether we are talking about absolutely indispensable written contracts, renegotiation clauses or exemption from reporting for small farms, the rule must be clear: You can't give one hand to the farmers and take them with two others. You cannot impose bureaucratic burdens and at the same time reduce funding.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, European farmers are once again being put in difficulty in trade disputes. China imposes anti-dumping tariffs of up to 62% on European pork, which is a response to Europe's legitimate pressures in the automotive sector. But those who pay the price are our farmers, family farms, processors and rural communities. European farmers thus become a bargaining chip in a conflict unrelated to their work but directly threatening their income and stability. The consequences will be felt throughout the European Union, price drops on domestic markets, so, Commissioner - I also ask you to follow me, Commissioner - I ask you that the European executive adopts a firm position and immediately comes up with concrete support measures for this sector, but also with a unified trade strategy that reduces the European Union's vulnerability to external pressures. Europe must defend its farmers and send a clear message: We will never give in to commercial blackmail.

Madam President, Commissioner Fitto, cohesion policy is the heart of European solidarity. It must remain the tool to bridge gaps and support lagging regions. That is precisely why, Commissioner, I would like you to convey our very strong message within the College of Commissioners. We need a strong cohesion policy. We need an independent cohesion policy and we need an adequately funded cohesion policy. This is the only way to have a strong European Union. Because we live in complicated times, in a difficult geopolitical context, with border war, climate change, social and economic pressures, such as the housing crisis. However, this housing crisis needs a European response, as today's Member States have unfortunately demonstrated their inability to solve this problem. Doubling investment in affordable housing is not just a social gesture, Commissioner, but a response to the hope of a secure future that millions of young people and families expect from Europe.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, in recent months, fire has turned almost one million hectares of agricultural land and forests in the European Union into ashes. In Spain, in just 10 days, the fire has consumed over 300,000 hectares. Portugal faces more than 180 000 hectares, while in Romania some crops could be 30% lower compared to last year due to drought and fires. We are not just talking about burnt land and forests, we are talking about destinies, families and our daily food. We need a European Union that responds with concrete actions, support for farmers and a stronger Common Agricultural Policy. Commissioner, we have heard little about what a European water reserve should be, which must be our shield against drought at the level of each Member State. This can only be done with the help of European funds. At the same time, we must understand that burnt forests mean irreparable losses for biodiversity and the future of future generations. Reconstruction must become a priority. Last but not least, in conclusion, I thank the European firefighters, including the Romanian ones, who went to support other Member States in the fight against the flames.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner, the European Union has been built on the principles of solidarity and equality. Cohesion policy is intended to reduce disparities between regions on the basis of objective, economic and social needs, and not on any other basis. I have taken note of this initiative and, while respecting and upholding the principle of Europe's diversity, I do not believe that European funds can be allocated according to ethnic or identity criteria, because this, in my opinion, would lead to an isolation of these regions. Europe means unity in diversity. Regions need support to combat poverty, isolation or lack of infrastructure, regardless of language or religion. Cohesion policy must not be transformed into an instrument of fragmentation or the creation of privileged regions where membership of a particular minority outweighs the real needs of the population. National minorities, without question, need a legal framework that allows the preservation of traditional, cultural and identity values. And I am glad that today my country, Romania, is an example of good practice at international level. Guaranteed education in the language of national minorities, access to decision-making fora, including at governmental but also regional level are just a few examples. But first of all, Commissioner, we have to say one thing very clearly. We need a cohesion policy that is not diluted into other policies. We need adequate funding for this cohesion policy so that we can support all regions of the European Union.

Madam President, Commissioner, the budget of the Common Agricultural Policy must remain separate, not diluted in other policies, let alone cut. To touch the CAP budget today is to weaken the backbone of the European Union. This policy is not about subsidies. It is about food, safety and the future of European villages. And today, these villages are slowly dying. 800 farms disappear every day, putting our food security at risk. Young farmers don't believe in us anymore. If we cut the budget, we will accelerate the abandonment of European agriculture, our villages becoming open-air museums, and we will import pesticide-filled food from third countries. I therefore ask you today, firmly, Commissioner, and unequivocally, that the CAP budget remain separate, with adequate and guaranteed funding post-2027. It is a red line, and whoever crosses this line assumes the beginning of the breakup of the European Union.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, in the last week, hundreds of hectares of agricultural land have been burned in Romania. Today, in the area of Marseille, firefighters are still battling the flames, and extreme drought is wreaking havoc across Europe. We are talking about a crisis that is no longer the exception. It's the new reality. European agriculture is on its knees and wildfires threaten lives, housing and essential infrastructure. We cannot leave the Member States alone to deal with a phenomenon that affects the whole of the European Union. We need a truly prepared Union, a coherent and sustainable European plan. This means urgent investments in reservoirs, irrigation systems, local reserves of water for firefighting, strengthening civil protection mechanisms and including the development of the network of volunteer firefighters. Solutions can't come too late. Lack of water clearly means lack of food, and lack of food means insecurity for every European citizen. And we don't need that.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the European agricultural sector is facing unprecedented challenges today. Severe droughts burn large parts of Europe, devastating floods destroy critical crops and infrastructure, and the pressure of inflation and the unfavourable effects of international trade agreements weigh heavily on farmers. The European Commission needs to understand one key thing: without adequate and consistent financing of the Common Agricultural Policy, we cannot talk about food security or rural stability. In this context, I am sending a clear signal: The budget of the Common Agricultural Policy must remain distinct and independent from other budget chapters. It cannot be merged with other policies, not even cohesion policy, which in turn must remain distinct. Farmers need predictability if we want stability for them. We cannot build the future of European agriculture with fragmented budgets and compromises. We need a long-term vision in which agriculture and regional development are the central pillars. Kissinger said: Who produces food...

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the European Parliament rightly calls for it to be respected. However, the reality, dear colleagues, is that the plant sector in the European Union cannot meet the need for protein feed for the Union’s animal husbandry. We therefore need to import more than 90% of the protein feed, which is genetically modified organisms, from Brazil and Argentina. Every kilogram of meat, every egg we eat is, in one form or another, produced with the help of these genetically modified feeds. The Union has a strategy to support farmers in protein production, but it appears to be insufficient. The real question is not why we import GM feed, but, Commissioner, why we do not produce it in the European Union as long as we consume it. I think it's time to get out of the hypocrisy zone. These products are considered safe from a human health point of view, according to EFSA, and European farmers should be left and, in my opinion, encouraged to cultivate them. Otherwise, we subject them to undeserved and deep unfair competition vis-à-vis third-country farmers.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, foot-and-mouth disease, mainly a disease of cows, is emerging after 35 years in Europe and is wreaking havoc in the livestock sector. The first outbreak was identified in Germany three months ago, and recently similar cases have been identified in Slovakia and Hungary, not far from the border with Romania. Farmers have already lost hundreds of millions of euros, either as a result of mortality or loss of income. The predictions are bleak, as the disease spreads at the speed of light. Farmers run the risk of being unable to save animals and those in the plant sector of no longer being able to sell their production. The Commission urgently needs to find mechanisms for compensating affected farmers. At the same time, the European executive must come up with adequate and effective public communication on the measures taken to prevent the disease, but also the identification of an effective vaccine, while developing a clear action plan established with the Member States. I draw attention to the fact that food security can be seriously affected by this disease, which acts as a real biological weapon.

Mr President, Commissioner, I congratulate you on the document presented. Colleagues, today we need to feed 450 million Europeans, while globally more than 700 million people are suffering from hunger. However, the figures in the sector are worrying. Income from agriculture is 40% lower than in any other sector, while only 12% of farmers are under 40 years old. Without firm action, Europe risks becoming dependent on imports, losing control over its own food security, and dependency creates vulnerabilities, as Mario Draghi put it. Time is no longer on our side, and tomorrow is already too late for farmers. Commissioner, today we need policies that protect European production, cut red tape, but above all - and I stress above all - adequate funding. The money for agriculture is not the money of farmers, but is the indispensable investment so that hunger is not used as a weapon of war. If we want a strong Europe, we need to make sure that it is also fed, and this starts with supporting our farmers.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the debate on the Mercosur agreement stirs up many emotions and raises questions to which no clear answers have yet been given. The reality, however, is that while European farmers are subject to the strictest environmental rules, in other parts of the world these rules simply do not exist. Europe has a duty to protect its farmers and provide them with strong guarantees so that they can continue to operate. They must not be sacrificed on the altar of our inability to provide them with certainty in such an uncertain world, generated by inflation, drought, floods or the war in Ukraine. They don't ask for privileges or preferential treatment. I'm just asking for the right to compete fairly. The compensation provisioned for farmers must be matched by the relaxation of production conditions in agriculture, Commissioner, and the agreement must be fair, create real trade opportunities and not destroy European agriculture. It is our duty to find the best solutions for both European farmers and consumers.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, desertification is a reality that cannot be challenged, and this was emphasised at COP 16. According to official data, desertification generates global costs of over €300 billion and affects more than 1.5 billion people, increasing migratory pressures and fuelling resource wars. The Union loses EUR 74 billion annually due to land degradation and inaction will reduce crop yields by at least 10% by 2050, creating a shortage for both water and food. Romania, my country, is fully confronted with these phenomena. We urgently need courageous action, which not only prevents this phenomenon, but even reverses it in the long term. To protect our food security, we need to invest in innovative technologies and solutions, such as new genomic techniques in sustainable water management and the development of smart irrigation systems at affordable prices for all farmers, and I stress this: affordable for all farmers. At the same time, efficient use of wastewater, especially around large urban centres, and serious investments in desalination of marine water are required, all of which must become a strategic priority and an obligation to our citizens. Private sector investment needs to be encouraged and the Commission needs to ensure that Member States use money for afforestation and forest curtains efficiently and quickly. Europe has solutions at its disposal, but without targeted investment and adequate funding, it will not be able to meet these challenges. Dear colleagues, the choice is ours: Act now or future generations will suffer the consequences of our destructible immobilism.

Mr President, Europe is at a demographic crossroads. The statistics speak for themselves. By 2050, almost 30% of the European population will be over 65 and the workforce will shrink by more than 57 million people by 2100. The share of the population of the European Union in the total global population will fall from 6% to 4%, reflecting an alarming drop in birth rates. Rural areas are experiencing this decline the most. Their depopulation poses direct risks to food security. We need to act now, investing in the future of young people and creating the conditions for them to stay at home. Affordable housing, quality education and well-paid jobs – and here I stress, well-paid jobs – are just some of the lines of action. Demographic change works and affects the regions of the European Union differently. In Romania, for example, over 4.5 million people have left abroad. Also, while in southern Italy or Spain houses are sold for one euro, other regions are facing an acute housing crisis. This is why we need to act differently, tailoring policies to local needs. Smart migration management is becoming a priority. We need a skilled workforce to ensure the economic sustainability of the European Union. I appreciate the publication of the demography 2023 toolbox, but Commissioner, without adequate funding, even the best policies will not have the desired impact. Funds such as the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the European Social Fund Plus must become the pillars of this effort. Dear colleagues, Europe is ageing. Our future should not be a burden to others.

Mr President, Commissioner, in the first debate here in the plenary of the European Parliament, the agricultural world is looking at you with great hope, convinced that you will make the best decisions for the sector, and I personally believe that. Colleagues, only 4% of European Union citizens are engaged in agriculture, yet they provide food for the other 96% of European citizens. We can thus see the extent of farmers' responsibility. Behind every product stands the work of farmers and sacrifices, and the reality is harsh. Every two days, a farmer in France commits suicide, and every life lost is a tragedy for all of us. Thousands of farmers face economic difficulties due to low prices and high production costs. Only 11% of farmers are under 40, and long working hours and harsh conditions profoundly affect their personal lives and mental health. These figures, colleagues, are not just statistics, they are real stories about families struggling to stay afloat, who want conditions to prosper and raise their children with dignity. That's why they put their hopes in us. Commissioner, farmers need solutions that mean stable prices to reduce market volatility, modernisation of agriculture through advanced technologies, programmes for young farmers with access to land and training. I am absolutely convinced that by adequately financing the sector - and here I stress, adequately financing the sector - and adopting coherent policies, the sector will continue to remain resilient, which also means guaranteeing the mental health of farmers.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, today Russia is not coming with tanks in front of us, but it is infiltrating lies into the phones and minds of our citizens. This is the reality of modern warfare. Algorithms are turned into weapons, and the manipulation of emotions and perceptions becomes a standard technique. We must understand that manipulation and disinformation carried out through platforms such as TikTok are not isolated incidents, but are deliberate and insidious strategies to undermine democratic processes. However, it is not enough to identify the problem, we must act. Digital education must become a priority, as well as sanctioning disinformation campaigns funded by Russia and China. Russia wants to confuse the European Union and weaken citizens' trust in state institutions and fragment society. We must not give them this victory. I draw your attention to the fact that today it is about Romania, but tomorrow it may be about another country. It is about Europe, about the freedom and the future of our democracies. In the face of this attack we must stand firm, united and cut the evil at its root.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, beyond the Budapest declaration, guaranteeing food security is undoubtedly a strategic objective for the whole of the European Union. In this respect, it is essential to build a European agricultural sector that is not only sustainable, but above all competitive. We need a strong common agricultural policy, strong co-financing and a stable, predictable and fair framework to enable farmers to face the economic and climate challenges, and the Green Deal needs to be adapted to the above. Farmers who are now on the streets are asking us for fair competition on both the domestic and global markets, so that their efforts are not undermined by the import of cheap products that do not meet the same quality or production standards, and this can and must be done. At the same time, we need measures to strengthen the position of farmers in the supply chain by guaranteeing them fair prices for their work. Europe can become a global leader in economic transformation, but this requires the courage to make the right decisions for the future and, above all, to secure the necessary funding for the sector.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, we are faced with a situation that a few years ago was unthinkable. The lack of rainfall, coupled with extremely high temperatures and over long periods, has led to extreme phenomena that go beyond the mere notion of drought. At the same time, rainfall in some states is comparable to Noah's biblical flood. These changes are profoundly affecting agriculture, which is failing to recover from one season to the next. At the same time, farmers are facing increasing challenges and the stability of the agricultural sector is being called into question. The Common Agricultural Policy was not designed to respond to such dynamic realities, nor to deal with consecutive crises. In Romania, this year, temperatures of over 40 degrees were constantly recorded, being the driest year since measurements are made, affecting about 2.5 million hectares. In Sicily, farmers suffered losses of EUR 2.7 billion, and in the Azores, drought led to a 70% reduction in agricultural production and examples can continue with Spain or other countries. The European Commission must understand that farmers cannot face these challenges alone. In this context, it must allocate funds to compensate for income losses, but also to be able to invest in modern irrigation infrastructure and use water efficiently, including regulating watercourses and creating storage capacities. It is essential that farmers have access to efficient insurance systems, but above all, Commissioner, that reliable credit mechanisms are created. Last but not least, I would like to ask the Commission what mechanisms and tools it has at its disposal to help farmers survive these extreme weather events now, when the crisis reserve seems to be insufficient. I want to ask you, Commissioner, whether you are considering bringing new money into agriculture, because we must not forget that without agriculture there is no food security, and without food security there is no future.